SCOTUS’ Denial To Hear Election Fraud Case

Another Infamy

Yesterday, The Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) chose not to hear a Case brought by Texas and 18 other States against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, for violations of election laws in the 2020 Presidential Election.

Two justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented, Alito citing Arizona v. California, 589 U.S. (Feb. 24,2020), wrote, “In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill that falls within our original jurisdiction.”

The denial stated in part, “The State of Texas’ motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of ‘standing’ … Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable (within the jurisdiction of a court) interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections.”

“Lack of ‘standing’? Lack of ‘interest’?

When 18 states whose voter’s votes are – or might be – made null and void by voter fraud, vote shifting and hundreds of sworn affidavits of witnesses to vote counting fraud in 4 democrat controlled states, join the Texas suit, and they together have no ‘standing’ nor ‘interest’?

Why does the Court think they filed the suit and 18 states joined them?

This decision raises numerous questions in the minds of millions of American voters:

In light of Alito’s and Thomas’ dissenting view and the effect of nullifying the votes of millions of voters if the complaints have merit, would it not have been wise for the court to hear the case?

What about the “merits” of the case which Republicans, Independents and even democrats need to know if they are ever to have confidence in our election system again?

Is not the 74.1 million voters who voted for the President, the second highest vote total for a Presidential candidate in history, 12 million more votes than he received in 2016, and reportedly 7 million votes less than Joe Biden worthy of hearing how this actually came about?

What about the known violations of state, and federal law, as well as the U.S. Constitution? Are they not worthy of considering by the High Court?

Is Chief John Roberts and the Court afraid of the backlash from progressives, anarchists, the media and “big tech” if they pursue the truth?

Considering this election might well have been “stolen” from President Trump, and failure to consider all the facts, i.e. ‘merits’ of the case for the public’s confidence in future elections, the High Court erred in their decision.

 
 

“Our cause is noble; it is the cause of mankind!”

George Washington

Restore America

Your Financial Support Is Needed.

Thank you all who have stood so faithfully with us in this difficult year!

Restore America is a 501(c)(3) non-profit Christian ministry supported solely by the contributions of our readers and a small number of churches. Donations are tax deductible for federal income tax purposes and can be made online, or by mail.If you prefer, you can mail your contribution to
Restore America
P.O. Box 2225
Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035Subscribe To Our Commentaries